( Mobile contact -49-1746937784) Case Reference: Raja Imran Khan / 

CHILD ABUSE & HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

by German authorities

 Constitutional Complaint against the administrative acts of the German Central Authorities 

ON BEHALF OF ALL ABDUCTED CHILDREN AND

ON BEHALF OF MY TWO SONS

IMANUEL RAJA BURHAN KHAN  and  BENEDICT RAJA ABDUR RAHMAN KHAN

ON BEHALF OF ALL FATHERS LEFT TO DEAL WITH THE MOST CRUEL AND MOST UNFAIR GERMAN JUSTICE SYSTEM

  Constitutional Complaint against the administrative acts of the German Central Authorities /German Courts/ Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen den Verwaltungsakt der Deutschen Zentralen Behörde  Bundesverfassungsgericht, Federal Constitutional Court, Schloßbezirk 3, 76131 Karlsruhe

 I request and invite your official attention to observe the proceedings and works of German family courts, authorities and institutions working in cases of International Child Abduction. Therefore I present to you for your information the following facts with request to please observe, how victimized children, parents and grandparents of national and international child abduction are treated by German authorities. Especially in regard to the proceedings of the German  Authorities in violations of : * the Universal Declaration of Human Rights * the UN-Convention of the Rights of the Child * the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction * the German Constitution * German national laws for the protection of the child and the family, i.e., the German civil code, the German criminal code. I request that a neutral panel of people aware and familiar with subject of Abductions, Kidnappings and German 
laws, with Basic Human Rights and Laws! should monitor this case immediately. I have not seen my new born son or the elder son ever since they were abducted from UK on September 15,2004 . My repeated requests to see my children have been denied. In December 2004 I was invited to see my children but at my arrival I was arrested at the airport for false charges against me. After twenty two I was released , I went to Jungendamt in reference to the invitation to see my children but , Frau Broecker at Friedrichshafen office tells me that she has no idea where my children are , while she was on the phone talking to my wife in front of me, asking me that my wife wants to know what are my future plans !. All these government offices and the workers involved were simply telling lies and they made sure they do not honor any of my rights or even their own official invitation they had sent to me to see my kids. My wife resorting to lies that she has fears ! and the German courts without any reason or evidence is denying my right to see my children. No one seems to care for the welfare of the children ! I have contacted Hague offices and human rights offices as well but no one is interested in any Justice.Is there any organization that really cares to see that these children are not kept apart just because German system wants to apply Nazi  like attitude and practices in its official dealings. The custody hearings were held in February 2005 without my knowledge or any official letter informing me of the hearings and so on. This is not only shameful but it is Child Abuse ! at the hands of the German legal system. I have been told by my wife indicating the brain washing of my children , such as " I will never let you see your children again , Your son who loved you so much has forgotten you, and your new born and the elder son will not know you as the father " and much worse , her lawyer Cornelia Letsche was standing next to us while all this and a lot more was said by my wife. This is open and deliberate disregard of rights of my children and my rights. 

Germany has adopted Nazi practices in its offices like Jungendamt, court system, Judges, auslanderamt and the police . All of these offices have no respect for the law or human rights nor any standards of fair and honest dealings but instead they have opened up new kind of concentration camps to separate families and to kill people by disregarding laws and doing as they please whatever they will. I have not seen my children for a long time now and I am being denied contact only on the grounds like that I must give up my American Citizenship and take up German Nationality, that I will not stay forever for my children here in Germany. Its very hard and very costly to travel and stay in any country where one is denied anyway the right to a work permit and other basic rights. I have been here now since October 7th 2005 but I see no Justice. I have been wronged in so many ways by these Authorities that I cannot write here all of it but I must see my children and must have contact on regular basis. For God's sake help me and my children to have our right to normal contact. Its our God given right ! not something that is based on nationality , color or being poor or rich .

I and my children are suffering immensely ! the brain washing ,alienating and estrangement  of these children is an open and sickliest form the new Nazi  system of injustice by the Germans .  We need help ! We need Justice ! and we need it now ! It has already been too long an abuse at the hands of the German Judicial system!  Is there not any Organization that makes sure that no such injustice is rooted in a system ? 

The German Central Authority commits criminal offenses in their proceedings by * manipulating files and proceedings * by favoring its German born Abductor - Kidnapper ( in this particular case- my wife- Konstanze Gertrud Leuser ), in most unlawful ways, by accepting mere words, allegations and implying that as evidence without any investigation or proof on purpose. * Gender-biased and discriminatory proceedings*  Whereas the German Central Authority on the one hand tend to show support for Human Rights Laws but on the other hand , fully disregarding these Laws and firmly establishing the child abusing environment in * child abductions * boycott * Divorce cases and more * and denial of access being the most common and preferred new Nazi instrument adopted and openly used by the German System .*

 The German Central Authority in its proceedings has applied: * political ideologies and discriminating processes in regard to the abolition of the core family by disrespecting the natural basic rights of the child to both his/her left behind parent and grandparents and vice versa * child traffic for the profit of the own judicial business is also a fact as Germany is running short on meeting its goal for the shortage of new born birth rate , the required younger generation to fulfill the missing gap for required future generation. A fact in Germany's official statistics * While the German Central Authority applies on one hand, the legalization of child abuse in the form of : * use of taking law into one's own hands * international parental child abduction * various forms of alienation undeniably set in as the logical consequence of parental abduction * discrimination of the abducted child and the left-behind environment whereas, on the other hand the legally acting left-behind parent  * is deprived of his basic rights together with the abducted child * is charged with the costs for the legal efforts to prevent child abduction and the infinite forms of alienation as the logical consequence in its wake while violating at the same time > The Universal Declaration of Human Rights < the UN-CRC * the European Convention for the protection of Fundamental Freedoms and human Rights * the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction * the German Constitution * the German existing laws for the protection of the child and the family , i.e., civil code and criminal code * highest German jurisdiction.

My brief list of Constitutional Complaint against several serious violations by the German Authorities

• of the German Constitution 
• of existing German laws and policies for the protection of the child and the family 
• of the European Convention of fundamental freedoms and Human Rights 
• of the Universal declaration of Human Rights 
• of the UN-Convention on the Rights of the Child 
• of the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in proceedings, decisions, administrative acts of the German Central Authority with the Federal Prosecutor General at the Federal Court of Justice.
• of Custody hearings held without informing me, my court appointed attorney had completely disregarded my instructions and my right and wish to submit evidence and to be present at the hearings but I was kept in total darkness , and these hearings and the Court's decision are illegal practices , complete violation of my rights and the laws.
• of  Jungendamt that it sides with and decides to stick with the abductor's wishes by not letting me see my children after I was officially invited after my repeated requests to contact in December 2004 to the Berlin office and the Friedrichshafen Jugendamt just tells me that we do not know where your wife and kids are !
• of the German police resorting to harassing and deliberately arresting me at several occasions asking me to answer to allegations by my wife ( the Abductor) at the police station.
• of no police reports written for racial assaults by Germans on foreigners , in this instance an assault on me that has left me disabled with serious neck injuries .

I hereby request separate, comprehensive, detailed stances and answers to the individual reports of the reporting project to the UN-CRC and the Hague Conference on International Law within the decision taking of the German Courts and Authorities dealing with my cases unconstitutionally. My written complaints to Human Rights offices in France brought no results either.

All this and many more serious violations ! that took place against me and now my children and we are being kept apart most unfairly because of an unfair Justice system. I am being repeatedly denied all possible contact with my children, I fear for my Life and my well being while I am here in Germany. I also fear for the well being of my children but I am not going to leave Germany , I will stay where ever my children are and I want to establish my rightful contact immediately without any further delays. Can anyone help ? I have a great Lawyer but the German system is a one way street that only leads to a most unfair and most Unjust end. I and my children cannot afford to be victims of the Nazi integrated Justice System. These are not just my views but also of countless Germans I met and heard from.   

  ! The "FACT" of incorrect proceedings in cases of child abduction and boycott of access at German family courts and German authorities are known for a long time on the national and on the international level. Within the democratic and constitutional state of German authorities apply the "Two Phase German Violation model" in all proceedings and cases where there is a Foreign National as the other party , whether its parental child abduction or any other case. I strongly believe that the "Two Phase German Violation Model" is applied to the benefit of the "German Article 13 formula" which is composed of "arbitrary proceedings + undue delay of proceedings = arbitrary decisions" 

The German Article 13 formula works efficiently to : * legalize child abduction by refusing the return of abducted children (The name of this formula is derived from the Article 13 exception of the HC, which is applied in overuse by Germany.) * legalize the Stockholm-Syndrome, boycott of access, hostile parenting, parental alienation, cultural alienation, destruction of the child's identity and roots by manipulating access proceedings. 

I find all this no different the practices of what the Nazi regime did , only that we are not being sent to Gas chambers for a shower but left to deal with it and die trying for our rights or get killed by the brutal and un-educated German Police force and its Justice system. Germany calls itself a civilized Nation wearing a friendly mask but in reality , more of its official courts and offices are an example of Nazi Laws and Practices in process ! as well as it is the case in its Civil offices. What price do we have to pay to for our children? With my American Passport in hand the Judge at the Divorce hearing says " Have you filed for Asylum" While he is fully aware of the case ! and in German language the Judge tells my wife that if I went back to USA it would be good for her, but if I stayed in Germany it would be bad ( schwer ) for her. And he says to her that he is becoming emotional and sympathizes with her !  all that without any evidence but on a preliminary hearing in Tettnang court. The translator provided by the court , she translated twenty minutes of talking by my wife in less than one minute with sympathetic words like " Gott ! Oh my Gott  " while my wife was telling lies . What kind of fairness or Justice is that I ask ? And when I said she spoke for twenty minutes and you translated not even a minute of it ! the translator replied , she was repeating herself ! which was a lie I was being told . Then I was not given half that time to say anything but always interrupted. Then I had asked to see my children, and for my belongings and defense materials my wife is holding onto illegaly, I was told., not now. When my wife was leaving she says, she has Angst ! and the judge bars me from places I have friends and witnesses to go to, while my wife stood about half an hour within ten inches from me laughing at me , telling me that she is brain washing my children before the preliminary hearings, telling me she will never let me see my kids and attacking me and my heritage, my family and uttering racial remarks while smiling outside and then ! literally laughing at me inside the court which the Judge took no notice of during the proceddings , but I had to tell her to have some shame because it was not anything funny that we sit in the court for. These are some of the facts.

 A German Law Professor, Dr. Salgo, said that the sooner the German family justice system was reformed, the less likelihood of some parents wanting to take the law in their hands. How does it come that the Child Abuse of child abduction and boycott of access is tolerated, accepted and encouraged for such a long time in Germany ?

 "The Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, or BVerfG) is Germany's Supreme Court, and its role is essentially "Guardian of the Constitution". The Court's principal areas of jurisdiction are laid down in Article 93 I of the Constitution (Grundgesetz). These areas are also detailed, along with all the Court's procedures, in the Statute of the Court (Bundesverfassungsgerichtgesetz, or BVerfGG). [...] A complaint of unconstitutionality can be brought by any person believing his or her fundamental rights to have been infringed by the act of a public authority, and who has exhausted other routes to a legal remedy. For the purposes of this jurisdiction, Article 93 I not only refers to the fundamental rights listed in Arts 1-19 of the Constitution, but also Arts. 20, 33, 38, 101, 103, and 104. (Verfassungsbeschwerde)1" On 18-20 May 1997 the ANGLO-GERMAN JUDICIAL CONFERENCE, took place in Darlington I think !.There,  Great Britain came up with the following outcome : The Federal Republic of Germany has very obviously and in contrast to other countries more cases in which a child is held in Germany than returns of the child according to the Hague Convention are executed. The court proceedings take multiple times longer than in Great Britain. German judges have little or nearly no experience in the application of international conventions and laws, which is reflected in the processing of international child abductions. This corresponds to the German self-image, that every judge is completely independant. 1 The Federal Constitutional Court, David Thorneloe, 25.10.96

Further reports as reference material for integration into the decision taking of the German Federal Constitutional Courts are below , so I am not looked upon at , as if I had nothing better to do but to make German system look ugly ! but Ugly it is !  I Love people ! but I have no respect for violators of Human Rights and Child abductors or those  a part of it in any way, hiddenly or openly. What kind of civilized nations or people are we ? if we are bent on hurting children ! people and families. That gives birth to Evil and Hate only. Have we not enough problems already, where innocent children and people are being blown up by Terrorists ? where famine and disasters are separating and killing families ! Isn't all that enough that the ,German system must also terrorize , hurt and separate families ?  Enough is enough , do not change good people into bad ones by taking away their children from them. ! I want to see my children now , and live our lives together. I want to see an end of the German horror courts ! violating our rights. Below are some factual cases of abuse ! that somehow got documented .

• Child Abuse by German judges; Part Four : Judge Baeyens from the Central Authority, Germany - Judge Baeyens from the German Central Authority, Germany – Amendment to the prosecution according to the German criminal code § 235, assistance in child abduction; Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 5 February 2002 
• Child Abuse by German judges; Part Four : Judge Baeyens from the Central Authority, Germany - Judge Baeyens from the German Central Authority, Germany – Amendment to the prosecution according to the German criminal code § 235, assistance in child abduction; Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 5 February 2002 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part One : German Central Authority #1 – wrong spelling; Version 001-02; 4 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part Two : German Central Authority #2 – wrong language; Version 001-02; 11 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part Four : German Central Authority #4 – Antidemocratic Behavior; Version 001-02; 16 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part Five : German Central Authority #5 – Arbitrary proceedings by violating the German civil code; Version 001-02; 18 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part Six : German Central Authority #6 – deliberate false declarations about appeal status and discriminatory proceedings; Version 001-02; 27 January 2002 
• Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Photo Gallery; Judicial Argumentation for Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction in contrast to Social Reality; A case study of 2000-2001; Part One : Feeding the Baby; Version 002/01; 8 December 2001; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law 
• Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Photo Gallery; Judicial Argumentation for Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction in contrast to Social Reality; A case study of 2000-2001; Part Two : Bathing the Baby; Version 001/01; 9 December 2001 
• Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and Quebec, Canada; Document Gallery; Judicial Argumentation for Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction in contrast to Social Reality; A case study of 2000-2001; Part One : The abducting parent isolated within the habitual state of residence; Version 001-02; 14 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law 
• Petition to the European Parliament : Child Abuse, Human Rights violations & Violation of the German Constitution by German family law jurisdiction; Expertise by a case study of 2000-2001; Version HRVFRG 001/01; Presented to the European Parliament; 2 December 2001 
• Petition to the European Parliament, Part Two : Child Abuse & Human Rights violations by German family law; The practice of German family law jurisdiction is working against a unified Europe and is terrorizing the peace in the world; Version HRVFRG 001- 02; Presented to The European Parliament, the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law; 10 February 2002
• Child Abuse & Human Rights violations by the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and the German Government under the social democrats; Part Six : The Child Committee of the German parliament, Excerpts 1998-2002; Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 13 February 2002 
• Dynamics of International Parental Child Abduction, The General Consequences and Mechanisms of International Parental Child Abduction; Part One: The abducting environment; October 2001, Wilhemshaven, Germany; Version JMSJ 001/01; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law; 18 October 2001 
• Dynamics of International Parental Child Abduction, The General Consequences and Mechanisms of International Parental Child Abduction; Part Two: The primary victim –The abused child; Version JMSJ 001/01; Presented to the UNCRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law; 23 December 2001 
•  Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and Quebec, Canada; Photo Gallery; Judicial Argumentation for Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction in contrast to Social Reality; A case study of 2000-2001; Part One : Feeding the Baby; Version 001/01; 2 December 2001; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law 
• Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Photo Gallery; Judicial Argumentation for Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction in contrast to Social Reality; A case study of 2000-2001; Part One : Feeding the Baby; Version 002/01; 8 December 2001; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law 
•  Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Photo Gallery; Judicial Argumentation for Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction in contrast to Social Reality; A case study of 2000-2001; Part Two : Bathing the Baby; Version 001/01; 9 December 2001 
• Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and Quebec, Canada; Document Gallery; Judicial Argumentation for Legalizing International Parental Child Abduction in contrast to Social Reality; A case study of 2000-2001; Part One : The abducting parent isolated within the habitual state of residence; Version 001-02; 14 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law
• Our fatherland without fathers - We crucify the unholy father – A documentation of social terror- We protest for the family; Version 002/01; dedicated to the German Parliament; 11 November 2001 
• Our fatherland without fathers - We crucify the unholy father – A documentation of social terror- We protest for the family; Version 003/01; dedicated to the Child Committee of the German Parliament; 29 November 2001 
• Petition to the European Parliament : Child Abuse, Human Rights violations & Violation of the German Constitution by German family law jurisdiction; Expertise by a case study of 2000-2001; Version HRVFRG 001/01; Presented to the European Parliament; 2 December 2001 
• Petition to the European Parliament, Part Two : Child Abuse & Human Rights violations by German family law; The practice of German family law jurisdiction is working against a unified Europe and is terrorizing the peace in the world; Version HRVFRG 001- 02; Presented to The European Parliament, the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law; 10 February 2002 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part One : German Central Authority #1 – wrong spelling; Version 001-02; 4 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part Two : German Central Authority #2 – wrong language; Version 001-02; 11 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC and The Hague Conference on Private International Law 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part Four : German Central Authority #4 – Antidemocratic Behavior; Version 001-02; 16 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part Five : German Central Authority #5 – Arbitrary proceedings by violating the German civil code; Version 001-02; 18 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament 
• Strategies of legalizing International Parental Child Abduction by applying Article 13 of The Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in Germany and in Quebec, Canada; Incorrect proceedings of Central Authorities; Part Six : German Central Authority #6 – deliberate false declarations about appeal status and discriminatory proceedings; Version 001-02; 27 January 2002
•  Alert – Save the Constitution of a German democratic state, Version HRVFRG 001/01 · Child Abuse by German judges; Part One : Judge Werner Gutdeutsch from the Higher Regional Court, Munich, Germany; Version HRVFRG 001/01; Presented to the UN-CRC; 19 November 2001 
• Child Abuse by German judges; Part Two : Judge Baeyens from the Central Authority, Germany; Version HRVFRG 001/01; Presented to the UN-CRC; 19 November 2001 · Child Abuse by German judges; Part Three : Judge Mueller from the District Court of Hildesheim, Germany; Version HRVFRG 001/01; 20 January 2002; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament 
• Child Abuse by German judges; Part Four : Judge Baeyens from the Central Authority, Germany - Judge Baeyens from the German Central Authority, Germany – Amendment to the prosecution according to the German criminal code § 235, assistance in child abduction; Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 5 February 2002 
• Child Abuse by German judges; Part Five : Judge Werner Gutdeutsch from the Higher Regional Court of Munich – Amendment to the prosecution according to the German criminal code § 235, assistance in child abduction; Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 11 February 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part One : A case study of 2000-2001; Version HRVFRG 001/01; Presented to the UN-CRC; 25 November 2001 · Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Two : Access proceedings with German family courts, A case study of 2001-2002; Version HRVFRG 0002-01; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 3 January 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Three : Education of German family judges & special monitoring and observance of the Higher Regional Court of Celle, Version HRVFRG 0002-01; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Four : Arbitrary & discriminating proceedings, Typical methods of German unfair trial; Special monitoring and observance of the Higher Regional Court of Celle Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 8 January 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Five : The German backup system of judicial crimes against Humanity by German family law jurisdiction, Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UNCRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 15 January 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Six : The role of the German Youth Offices within the judicial crimes against Humanity by German family law jurisdiction – Example : Youth Office of Hildesheim, Version HRVFRG 001-02-amended; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 25 January 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Seven : The role of the German Youth Offices within the judicial crimes against Humanity by German family law jurisdiction – Mayor Konrad Deufel of Hildesheim responsible for the Youth Office of the city of Hildesheim, Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UNCRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 28 January 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Eight : The role of the Justice Ministries of the German Länder within the judicial crimes against Humanity by German family law jurisdiction; Example: Justice Minister Christian Pfeiffer responsible for the Family Courts and Prosecutors of Lower Saxony, Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 31 January 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Nine : Arbitrary & discriminatory proceedings, typical methods of German unfair trial; Special Monitoring and Observance of the District court of Stuttgart and the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart, Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 9 February 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Ten : The role of the German Youth Offices within the judicial crimes against Humanity by German family law jurisdiction – Mayor Konrad Deufel of Hildesheim responsible for the Youth Office of the city of Hildesheim – Amendment to the prosecution according to the German criminal code § 235, assistance in child abduction, Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 11 February 2002 
• Child Abuse and Human Rights violations by German family law jurisdiction; Part Eleven : The role of the Justice Ministries of the German Länder within the judicial crimes against Humanity by German family law jurisdiction; Example: Justice Minister Ulrich Goll responsible for the Family Courts and Prosecutors of Lower Baden-Wuerttemberg, Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 12 February 2002 
• Child Abuse & Human Rights violations by the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and the German Government under the social democrats; Part One : The alleged independence of German family judges as political opportunism; Version HRVFRG 001/01 
• Child Abuse & Human Rights violations by the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and the German Government under the social democrats; Part Two : Submitting the Interest of the Child to political and economic interests; Version HRVFRG 001/01; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 11 December 2001 
• Child Abuse & Human Rights violations by the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and the German Government under the social democrats; Part Three : The German Federal Ministry as the interface between political/economic interests and judicial/economic interests; Version HRVFRG 001/01; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 19 December 2001 
• Child Abuse & Human Rights violations by the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and the German Government under the social democrats; Part Four: Events that should change the German Mind about Violations of Human Rights and Children' Rights; Excerpts 1997-2001; Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 3 January 2002 
• Child Abuse & Human Rights violations by the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and the German Government under the social democrats; Part Five : Events that should change the German Mind about Violations of Human Rights and Children’ Rights; Excerpts 1997-2002; Version HRVFRG 001-02; Presented to the UN-CRC, The Hague Conference on Private International Law and The European Parliament; 7 February 2002

  Judgments by the European Court of Human Rights due to violations of the European Convention on Fundamental Freedoms and Human Rights by Germany : 

( A small glimpse-I can add plenty more factual data here )

 HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY GERMAN FAMILY LAW JURISDICTION 

 13 July 2000, Elsholz v. Germany 25735/94, Violation of Art. 6, Art. 8 

 20 September 2001, Suess v. Germany 40324/98, Violation of Art. 6, Art. 8, admissibility decision 

 11 October 2001, Sahin v. Germany 30943/96, Violation of Art. 6, Art. 14 

 11 October 2001, Sommerfeld v. Germany 31871/96, Violation of Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 14 

 11 October 2001, Hoffmann v. Germany 34045/96, Violation of Art. 6, Art. 8, Art. 14 

 HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY GERMAN JURISDICTION : 

 CASE OF KÖNIG v. GERMANY, 28/06/1978, 6232/73 

 CASE OF BOCK v. GERMANY, 29/03/1989, 11118/84 

 CASE OF DEUMELAND v. GERMANY, 29/05/1986, 9384/81 

 CASE OF NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY, 16/12/1992, 13710/88 

 CASE OF PAMMEL v. GERMANY, 01/07/1997, 17820/91 

 CASE OF PROBSTMEIER v. GERMANY, 01/07/1997, 20950/92 

 CASE OF ELSHOLZ v. GERMANY, 13/07/2000, 25735/94 

 CASE OF KLEIN v. GERMANY, 27/07/2000, 33379/96 

 CASE OF METZGER v. GERMANY, 31/05/2001, 37591/97 

 CASE OF SOMMERFELD v. GERMANY, 11/10/2001, 31871/96 

 CASE OF HOFFMAN v. GERMANY, 11/10/2001, 34045/96 

 CASE OF SUESS v. GERMANY, 20/11/2001, 40324/98 

 CASE OF JANSSEN v. GERMANY 20/12/2001, 23959/94 

 UN-Complaint against the Youth Office Aurich, East Frisia, Lower Saxony, Germany (G/SO 215/51 GERM. GEN, 11 January 1999) 

 UN-Complaint against the Youth Office, Wilhelmshaven, East Frisia, Lower Saxony, Germany (G / SO 215 / 51 GERM GEN; 10 September 2001)